wasif twm case law Fundamentals Explained
wasif twm case law Fundamentals Explained
Blog Article
“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any with the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din saw firstly the deceased and after some distance they noticed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not imply that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This sort of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of previous observed.
۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔
Like a society, it can be essential to carry on striving to get a just legal system that assures fairness, protection, and respect for all individuals’ right to life.
Section 302 of your Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to act as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application of your death penalty or life imprisonment depends to the specifics of each and every case, such as any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced towards the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, Additionally it is a very well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for the accused who intentionally murdered the victim.
The issue here is that an accused may say that they meant to injure the target, but they did not plan to get rid of them. In other words, they may claim that thedeath that resulted a result of the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor meant.
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that the moment the act of misconduct is recognized as well as the employee is found guilty after thanks check here process of law, it is the prerogative of your employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the different penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is just not proportionate with the seriousness of your act of misconduct just isn't suitable even so the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside of a structured and lawful manner. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Supplied the legal analysis on the topic issue, we are in the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally audio, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're matter to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case in the petitioners for promotion may very well be regarded as, however, we have been crystal clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy issue into the approval from the competent authority.
Thus, it had been held that the right to the healthy environment was part from the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article 9 and fourteen with the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all sides of human existence, all such amenities and facilities that a person is entitled to get pleasure from with dignity, legally and constitutionally.
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by legislation." It really is effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
competent authority has determined the eligibility of your private respondents and found them to get in good shape for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)